Thoughts on the Fuji X-T1

editorial Jan 28, 2014

Fuji’s release of the much leaked X-T1has caused quite the buzz online. The X-T1 is the number one preordered mirror less camera on Amazon USA. Fuji’s entry into the “retro SLR styled compact system camera” looks like it has a lot going for it.

XT1 Front Left 56mm WhiteBK
Inevitably, comparisons to the Olympus OM-D E-M1 will be forthcoming. I am selling my E-M1 review kit in case anyone is interested. If you don’t want the E-M1, please click on the “DONATE” button to right and give generously to help a struggling blogger (unlike Phil and Steve, I don’t get cameras for free). However, not having the camera in hand will not deter me from making some comparisons. Through the magic of Camerasize.com, I can provide some physical comparisons.
X t1 vs e m1 front
X t1 vs e m1 back
 X t1 vs e m1 top
X t1 hand
The images clearly show that the X-T1 and E-M1 are extremely similar and size and weight. Camerasize also provides comparison statistics:
  • FujiFilm X-T1 is 1% (1.4 mm) narrower and 4% (3.7 mm) shorter than Olympus OM-D E-M1.
  • FujiFilm X-T1 is 26% (16.4 mm) thinner than Olympus OM-D E-M1.
  • FujiFilm X-T1 [440 g] weighs 11% (57 grams) less than Olympus OM-D E-M1 [497 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).
  • FujiFilm X-T1 dimensions: 129×89.8×46.7 mm (camera body only, excluding protrusion)
  • Olympus OM-D E-M1 dimensions: 130.4×93.5×63.1 mm (camera body only, excluding protrusion)
The hand graphic at the end puts the whole thing in perspective: it’s a small camera.
PROS and CONS
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1
Pros
  • Faster top shutter speed.  (1/8000s vs. 1/4000s)
  • 5-Axis IBIS (In Body Image Stabilization)
  • Larger lens selection + more extensive 3rd party lenses (including Schneider-Kruznach lenses)
  • Touch Screen control for focus point selection and camera triggering.
Cons
  • Smaller sensor size (2x crop vs 1.5x crop – can be a pro for certain users)
  • Worse High-ISO performance (ISO 2500 max usable in my tests, ISO 3200 with heavy post processing)
Fujifilm X-T1
Pros
  • All lenses are extremely high quality.
  • “Kaizen” – Fuji listens to customers and updates all models continuously.
  • X-Trans II processor
  • Superior High ISO performance with extremely clean images up to ISO 3200.
  • In-camera RAW converter with access to some of the best film emulations on the market
  • Support for UHS-II SDXC cards (over 250Mbps read/write speeds
Cons
  • Limited lens selection. (but more lenses are being added, including Zeiss glass)
  • Not all RAW converters support X-Trans well
Shared by both cameras
Pros
  • Support for legacy glass (Olympus has an edge here with its IBIS)
  • Best EVF’s in the business (Fuji may have an edge here)
  • Rugged, Stupid-Prooftm construction
  • Built-in WiFi hotspot with remote control apps for smartphones and tablets
  • Hybrid CDAF/PDAF Autofocus
  • Fast continuous frame rates (E-M1 10 fps, X-T1 8 fps)
Cons
  • Not as well known as the Big Three
  • Market is doing very well in Japan, but not as well in the USA.
  • Pros are using them as backup/second shooter cameras, but adoption as primary camera hampered by lack of Professional Services Organizations
That’s about all i can think of for right now. More will come top me when I get the X-T1 in my hands.
  •  
  • FujiFilm X-T1 is 26% (16.4 mm) thinner than Olympus OM-D E-M1.
  • FujiFilm X-T1 [440 g] weights 11% (57 grams) less than Olympus OM-D E-M1 [497 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).
  • FujiFilm X-T1 dimensions: 129×89.8×46.7 mm (camera body only, excluding protrusion)
    Olympus OM-D E-M1 dimensions: 130.4×93.5×63.1 mm (camera body only, excluding protrusion)

– See more at: http://camerasize.com/compare/#520,482

Great! You've successfully subscribed.
Great! Next, complete checkout for full access.
Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.
Success! Your account is fully activated, you now have access to all content.